[e] (0) Comment on the current violation of RFC2617. We may need to f…

…ix this at some point. git-svn-id: http://svn.whatwg.org/webapps@2463 340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74
whatwg · Nov 26, 2008 · 07b4ecd · 07b4ecd
1 parent e660a38
commit 07b4ecd
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 7 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/index b/index
@@ -29220,6 +29220,9 @@ interface <dfn id=htmloptionelement>HTMLOptionElement</dfn> : <a href=#htmleleme
   agents to identify login forms on pages even when the user might not
   want to log in.</p>
 
+  <p class=note>The lack of a <code title=bnf-formauth-realm>realm</code> parameter in the challenge
+  is an intentional violation of RFC2617 (it isn't clear how the realm
+  concept would apply in this context).</p>
 
 
 

diff --git a/source b/source
@@ -33031,6 +33031,10 @@ interface <dfn>HTMLOptionElement</dfn> : <span>HTMLElement</span> {
   agents to identify login forms on pages even when the user might not
   want to log in.</p>
 
+  <p class="note">The lack of a <code
+  title="bnf-formauth-realm">realm</code> parameter in the challenge
+  is an intentional violation of RFC2617 (it isn't clear how the realm
+  concept would apply in this context).</p>